PROJECT SUMMARY

What is the impact of counter-radicalization policies on multiculturalism and migrant membership in Europe? Many observers see state responses to homegrown terrorist threats as emphasizing assimilation in a way that marks the end of multiculturalism. This project explores instead the hypothesis that current anti-terror practices are producing an increased division of European societies along ethno-religious lines.

Media and political discourse in European countries have announced the “end” of multiculturalism. The main reason behind this “backlash” being the need of fighting “homegrown terrorism”, a danger understood as linked to diaspora ghettoization and ethnic and religious separateness. In this sense, counter-radicalization policies and practices should be at the vanguard of an assimilationist and anti-multiculturalist turn.

Yet is it the case? Several recent studies have shown that multicultural practices continue under different guises. Building on these findings, and through a comparison of Britain, France and the Netherlands, the project explores the hypothesis that counter-radicalization policies do not mark a return to assimilationist policies. Instead, through everyday practices of policing, they perpetuate and reinforce the ethno-religious division of national “communities”. The consequence of these policies is to remove fundamental questions about pluralism and citizenship from the political debate, casting them instead in the technical and depoliticized language of security.

The proposed research is based on a discourse analysis of policy documents, in-depth qualitative interviews and ethnographic observation. It promotes international collaboration with research centers in France (Cultures & Conflits) and the UK (SOAS and Manchester University). In the Netherlands, the project will benefit from collaborations at the University of Amsterdam and at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. The project contributes to ongoing debates in security studies, migration and transnationalism, and extends our understanding of the relationship between security and the politics of belonging in Europe in a context of growing populism and anti-Muslim sentiment

OBJECTIVES

Multiculturalism in Europe is allegedly “dead”. Between the mobility of labor and the promotion of plural citizenship, on the one hand, and states’ needs to assert their sovereignty against homegrown terrorism on the other, the latter has prevailed; or so we are told (Bleich 2003; Joppke 2004; Turner, 2007). If this were the case, a main tool for this “backlash” against multiculturalism ought to be precisely counter-radicalization policies. This research argues the opposite: My main hypothesis is that rather than promoting “assimilation” or other forms of ethnic homogenization, counter-radicalization policies produce and reinforce a division of society into discrete ethno-religious groups. This “policed multiculturalism” removes fundamental questions about pluralism from political debate, casting them instead in a depoliticized language of security as a bureaucratic exercise in problem-solving.

In this project I am less concerned by normative questions around multiculturalism, the subject of a very large literature (among many others, Taylor 1994; Kymlicka 1996), than by multiculturalism as a set of states’ practices related to the governance of immigrants and ethnic minorities, and their modes of ethno-religious difference (Vertovec, 2010:10). Britain, France and the Netherlands seem relevant cases. In the UK the London bombings of July 2005 perpetrated by British-born Muslims, and a spate of failed or disrupted plots before and after were arguably a turning point. In the Netherlands, the discourses of Pim Fortuyn and Geert Wilders, and the murder of Theo van Gogh have prompted a similar shift. France is usually portrayed as the counterpoint of multiculturalist policies (Rigouste, 2009). Despite the widespread émeutes of 2005 and the recurrent public debate around the Islamic veil, some British and Dutch policymakers have allegedly been looking to the “French model” of “assimilation” for guidance.

Three questions and related hypothesis support my main hypothesis that practices of point in an opposed direction.

First, why is there a contradiction between the political discourse, the media debate and actual counter-radicalization practices? I argue that while politicians, relayed by media outlets, might expect electoral gains from an assimilationist stance, it is not shared by security professionals. I follow Didier Bigo and others in arguing that security bureaucracies and security experts have acquired an unprecedented level of autonomy and legitimacy (Bigo 2008; c.a.s.e. collective 2006; Wæver 1993). Analysis of security policies therefore needs to be carried out at the level of (a) bureaucratic routines and (b) bureaucratic politics and struggles. This is done through the analysis of security professionals’ social positions and trajectories (Allison 1969 ; see also Dezalay 2001; Georgakakis 2008). The project will therefore begin by mapping discourses and social positions (see methods section) in order to understand how counter-radicalization policies targeting communities and ethnic groups have emerged and continue to be sustained. Specific attention will be given to perceived causes of radicalization, mechanisms of radicalization and proposed counter-radicalization measures.

Second, how do counter-radicalization practices operate concretely in relation to questions of diversity and citizenship? Everyday practices of state identification and their related technologies are crucial in establishing and maintaining social identities (Brouwer, 2007; Caplan and Torpey 2001; Guild, 2007; Rose, 1996). The hypothesis is therefore that by routinely operating along ethnic and religious lines, counter-radicalization policies reinforce them. A second step of the study is therefore an ethnographic analysis (through observation and interviews) of counter-radicalization practices (surveillance, ethnic profiling, risk profiling, biometric identification, and techniques of community policing).

Lastly, what is the impact of these policies on the targeted populations? Counter-radicalization policies in European states have engaged in contested community engineering in order to create acceptable forms of “moderate”, “European” Islam (Mandaville 2007). My third hypothesis is that communities have not begun “assimilating”, nor cut their ties with homelands, to the opposite (Brighton 2007). Counter-radicalization has had two effects. First, they have reinforced the feeling of community alienation. Second, through cooperation with sending states - Turkey and Morocco will be analyzed for the important numbers of their nationals in Europe as well as for the deployed policies of attention towards their nationals (Dijkink and van der Welle)– of increasing the links between targeted communities and their states of origin. Through an analysis of politics in the “transnational social field” (Adamson and Demetriou 2007; Levitt and Glick Schiller 2004; Ragazzi 2009), a third step of the study will therefore explore the way in which communities are seen both as a target group and a policing tool, and the consequences of these practices.

FUNDING

This research project is funded by Marie-Curie Career Integration Grant No. 294152 and Netherlands Scientific Organization (NWO) Veni Grant No. 451-11-018. The research project benefits from the support of the Center for International Studies and Research (CERI) at Sciences Po Paris who has kindly accepted to host me as associate researcher.

REFERENCES

Adamson, Fiona, and Madeleine Demetriou (2007) "Remapping the Boundaries of `State' and `National Identity': Incorporating Diasporas into IR Theorizing", European Journal of International Relations, n° 4 vol. 13. pp. 489-526.

Allison, Graham (1969) "Conceptual Models of the Cuban Missile Crisis", American Political Science Review, n° 63 vol. 3. pp. 689-718.

Amoore, Louise, and Marieke de Goede (2005) "Governance, risk and dataveillance in the war on terror", Crime, Law & Social Change,  vol. 43. pp. 149-173.

Ansari, Humayun (2003), The "infidel" within : the history of Muslims in Britain, 1800 to the present, London, C. Hurst.

Awan, Akil (2007). "Transitional Religiosity Experiences: Contextual Disjuncture and Islamic Political Radicalism"  In Tahir Abbas (ed.), Islamic political radicalism : a European perspective, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press. pp. 207-230.

Bagguley, Paul, and Yasmin Hussain (2007). "Non-Muslim Responses to the 7th  July Bombing in London and the Muslim Diaspora in Britain and its Responses to the London Bombings of 7th July 2005"  In Bruce Hoffman, William Rosenau, Andrew J. Curiel and Doron Zimmermann (ed.), The Radicalization of Diasporas and Terrorism. A Joint Conference by the RAND Corporation and the Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation.

Bail, Christopher A. (2010) "How Terrorists Became Racists: Secrecy and Framing in Britain's Domestic Counter-Terrorism Policy, 2001-2008", American Journal of Sociology. available at:  forthcoming.

Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, and Brian T. Connor (2008) "The Ethnos in the Polis: Political Ethnography as a Mode of Inquiry", Sociology Compass, n° 1 vol. 2. pp. 139-155.

Bakker, Edwin (2006), Jihadi terrorists in Europe : their characteristics and the circumstances in which they joined the jihad ; an exploratory study, Den Haag, Clingendael.

Bigo, Didier (2008). "Globalized (in)security, The field and the ban-opticon"  In Didier Bigo and Anastassia Tsoukala (ed.), Terror, insecurity and liberty : illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11, London ; New York, Routledge. pp. 10-48.

Bigo, Didier, and Laurent Bonelli (2008), Preventing violent radicalisation and terrorist recruitment in the EU. The threat to Europe by radical Islamic terrorist groups, Brussels, EU Parliament.

Bigo, Didier, Sergio Carrera, Elspeth Guild, and R.B.J. Walker (2010), Europe's 21st Century Challenge, Ashgate.

Bigo, Didier, Philippe Bonditti, Julien Jeandesboz, and Francesco Ragazzi (2008) "State-of-Art Review of Scholarly Research on Security Technologies and Their Relation to the Societies Which They Serve", INEX Deliverables (EU-Funded Framework Program 7), n° 1.

Bleich, Erik (2003), Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policymaking since the 1960s, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

Brighton, Shane (2007) "British Muslims, multiculturalism and UK foreign policy: ‘integration’ and ‘cohesion’ in and beyond the state", International Affairs, n° 1 vol. 83. pp. 1-17.

Brouwer, Evelyn (2007). "The use of Biometrics in EU databases and Identity documents"  In Juliet Lodge (ed.), Are you who you say you are? The EU and Biometric Borders, Nijmegen, Wolf Legal Publishers. pp. 45-66.

Buijs, Frank J., Froukje Demant, and Atef Hamdy (2006), Strijders van eigen bodem. Radicale en democratische moslims in Nederland (Worriers of own soil. Radical and democratic Muslims in the Netherlands), Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.

Bux, S. (2007) "Muslim Youths, Islam and Violent Radicalisation: Addressing some Myths", The Police journal, n° 3 vol. 80. pp. 267-278.

c.a.s.e. collective (2006) "Critical approaches to security in Europe, a networked manifesto", Security Dialogue, n° 4 vol. 37.

Caplan, Jane, and John C. Torpey (2001), Documenting individual identity : the development of state practices in the modern world, Princeton N J, Princeton University Press.

Cesari, Jocelyne (2007). "Terrorism and Diasporas in the United States"  In Bruce Hoffman, William Rosenau, Andrew J. Curiel and Doron Zimmermann (ed.), The Radicalization of Diasporas and Terrorism. A Joint Conference by the RAND Corporation and the Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation.

Choudhury, Tuyfal (2007) "The Role of Muslim Identity Politics in Radicalisation", A working paper of the Department of Communities and Local Government, London.

Dalgaard-Nielson, A (2007) "The Elusive Root Causes: Studying Violent Radicalisation in Europe", DIID Working Paper.

den Boer, Monica (2007) "Wake-up call for the Lowlands: Dutch counterterrorism from a comparative perspective", Cambridge Review of International Affairs, n° 2 vol. 20. pp. 285-302.

Boer, Monica den, Claudia Hillebrand, and Andreas Nölke (2008) "Legitimacy Under Pressure: The European Web of Counter-Terrorism Networks", Journal of Common Market Studies, n° 1 vol. 46. pp. 101-124.

Dijkink, Gertjan, and Inge Van Der Welle (2009) "Diaspora and Sovereignty: Three cases of public alarm in the Netherlands", Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, n° 5 vol. 100. pp. 623-634.

Dittrich, Mirjam (2006) "Muslims in Europe: Addressing the Challenges of Radicalisation", European Policy Centre (EPC) Working Paper, n° 23.

Githens-Mazer, Jonathan (2008) "Islamic Radicalisation among North Africans in Britain", The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, n° 4 vol. 10. pp. 550-570.

Guild, Elspeth (2007). "Unreadable Papers ? The EU's first experiences with biometrics: Examining EURODAC and EU's borders"  In Juliet Lodge (ed.), Are you who you say you are? The EU and Biometric Borders, Nijmegen, Wolf Legal Publishers.

Guittet, Emmanuel-Pierre (2008). "Military Activities inside National Territory: the French Case"  In Didier Bigo and Anastassia Tsoukala (ed.), Terror, insecurity and liberty : illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11, London ; New York, Routledge. pp. 10-48.

Hoffman, Bruce, William Rosenau, Andrew J. Curiel, and Doron Zimmermann, eds. The Radicalization of Diasporas and Terrorism. A Joint Conference by the RAND Corporation and the Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2007

Joppke, Christian (2004) "The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: theory and policy", The British Journal of Sociology, n° 2 vol. 55. pp. 237-257.

Kepel, Gilles (2005), The Roots of Radical Islam, London, Saqi Books.

Khosrokhavar, Farhad (2005), Suicide Bombers: Allah’s New Martyrs, London, Pluto Press.

Kymlicka, Will (1996), Multicultural Citizenship A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, New York, Oxford University Press Incorporated.

Lambert, Robert (2008) "Empowering Salafis and Islamists Against Al-Qaeda: A London Counterterrorism Case Study", PS: Political Science & Politics, n° 1 vol. 41. pp. 5.

Lieberman, Evan S. (2005) "Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research", American Political Science Review, n° 3 vol. 99.

Levitt, Peggy, and Nina Glick Schiller (2004) "Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society", International Migration Review, n° 3 vol. 38. pp. 1002-1039.

Mandaville, Peter (2007), Transnational Muslim Politics: Reimagining the Umma, London, Routledge.

Modood, Tariq, Richard Berthoud, Jane Lakey, James Nazroo, Patten Smith, Satnam Virdee, Sharon Beishon (1997), Ethnic minorities in Britain : diversity and disadvantage, London, Policy Studies Institute.

NYPD (2007), Radicalisation in the West: The Homegrown Threat, New York.

O'Duffy, Brendan (2008) "Radical Atmosphere: Explaining Jihadist Radicalization in the UK", PS: Political Science & Politics, n° 1 vol. 41. pp. 6.

Pape, Robert Anthony (2005), Dying to win : the strategic logic of suicide terrorism, New York, Random House.

Pedahzur, Ami (2005), Suicide terrorism, Cambridge ; Malden MA, Polity.

Ragazzi, Francesco (2009) "Governing Diasporas", International Political Sociology, n° 4 vol. 3. pp. 378–397.

Rigouste, Matthieu (2009), L'ennemi intérieur. La généalogie coloniale et militaire de l'ordre sécuritaire dans la France contemporaine, Paris, La Découverte.

Rose, Nikolas (1996) "The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government", Economy and Society, n° 3 vol. 25. pp. 327-356.

Roy, Olivier (2004), Globalized Islam : the search for a new Ummah, New York, Columbia University Press.

Sageman, Marc (2004), Understanding terror networks, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.

Smith, Robert C. (2003) "Diasporic Memberships in Historical Perspective: Comparative Insights from the Mexican, Italian and Polish Cases", The International migration review : IMR, n° 3 vol. 37. pp. 36.

Spalek, Basia, and Robert Lambert (2008) "Muslim communities, counter-terrorism and counter-radicalisation: A critically reflective approach to engagement", International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, n° 4 vol. 36. pp. 257-270.

Taylor, Charles, and Amy Gutmann (1994), Multiculturalism : examining the politics of recognition, Princeton N J, Princeton University Press.

Tilly, Charles (2006) "Afterward: Political Ethnography as Art and Science.", Qualitative Sociology,  vol. 29. pp. 409-412.

Turner, Brian J. (2007) "The Enclave Society: Towards a Sociology of Immobility", European Journal of Social Theory,  vol. 10. pp. 287-304.

Vertovec, Steven, and Susanne Wessendorf (2010), The Multiculturalism Backlash, New York, Routledge.

Wæver, Ole (1993). "Societal security: the concept"  In Ole Waever, Barry Buzan, M. Kelstrup and Lemaître p. (ed.), Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe, New York, St Martin's Press.

Weller, Paul, Alice Feldman, Kingsley Purdam, and Great Britain. Home Office. Research Development and Statistics Directorate. (2001), Religious discrimination in England and Wales, vol. 220, London, Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.

Whine, Mike (2007). "Terrorism and Diasporas in the UK"  In Bruce Hoffman, William Rosenau, Andrew J. Curiel and Doron Zimmermann (ed.), The Radicalization of Diasporas and Terrorism. A Joint Conference by the RAND Corporation and the Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation.